It's our upgrade path from bash to a better language and runtime. Other repos in the IPython organization contain things like the website, documentation builds, etc. Official repository for IPython itself. A delightful community-driven framework for managing your bash configuration, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community. A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript. The language is a superset of Python 3. node.js command-line interfaces made easy Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt. Better than PowerShell, but not bash-wards compatible makes it not a great choice for me. A better and friendly vi(vim) mode plugin for ZSH. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output. Compare zsh-vi-mode vs xonsh and see what are their differences. :shell: Portable Unix shell commands for Node.js When comparing xonsh and zx you can also consider the following projects: It’s optional and you may do it later as well. The language is a superset of Python 3.6+ with additional shell primitives. To enter the Xonsh shell, simply run this command: xonsh It advises you to run a wizard and create a customized rc file for Xonsh shell. xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt. If you have other shells installed on your system, you can easily switch the shells. Several command-line shells, such as Xonsh, Bash (Unix shell), and Z. I should probably write a blog post about that. Your terminal runs a default shell (usually bash shell). In computing, a shell is a computer program that exposes an operating systems services to a. So the funny thing is that Oil is the most statically-typed shell implementation, even though it's nominally written in Python :) It uses fine-grained static types, where as shells written in C use a homogeneous "WORD*" representation in C, and strings with control codes embedded in them. This is because of all the allocation and GC overhead, in both time and space. That means you should be able to translate Bash idioms you will likely encounter to PowerShell/Xonsh on yourself. I'd say that Python and JS are 10x as slow as native code for "business" and "web app" workloads, but they're closer to 100x too slow for ASTs and graphs. This core of the program is the elaborate and strongly typed "lossless syntax tree", which is basically what's used in linters and formatters.Įven though I've been using both C++ and Python for >20 years, it is a little shocking how much worse Python is for AST- and graph-based workloads. This also tracks with my experience with, where we reverse-engineered the shell in an experimental fashion with Python, and then evolved that implementation into a statically typed language that generates C++ (using MyPy, ASDL, and algebraic data types). The other 50% is that dynamic languages simply allowed people to produce popular and useful software at a greater rate, especially for the web, so we ended up with a lot of software written in dynamic languages! Doing web apps in Java vs. That is, he says that for awhile we thought that clock speeds would increase, and JITs would get better, and so we could design languages with semantics without regard to performance - language that almost require slow implementations. JITs are fast in common cases, but they not only have big costs in terms of memory (code storage) and startup time, but they're hard to engineer with!Įmery Berger has memorable framing of this - "Perl, Python, PHP, and JS are the irrational exuberance" languages. They realized they needed to change the LANGUAGE in order to be able to write fast programs, like writing Google Docs and GMail in the browser. They were spending a lot of time looking into why web page performance was falling off various cliffs in v8. IIRC this was precisely why the Dart project was started more than 10 years ago by the v8 authors at Google. The semantics of JavaScript do not allow v8 to be fast enough. JavaScript isn't a good language to write the TypeScript compiler or a linter, because v8 isn't fast enough. You could frame it as a "failure of JITs in the 2010's". (I'm looking for references/measurements specifically on these types of workloads.) I think of these "AST- or graph-based workloads", as opposed to numeric workloads. Yup, more generally, I'd say that statically typed languages that compile to native code (Rust, Go, C++, etc.) are necessary to achieve good performance when writing linters / formatters, compilers, and interpreters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |